H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Jelena Ostapenko vs Paula Badosa H2H: 4-2

Jelena Ostapenko holds a 4–2 lead over Paula Badosa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jelena Ostapenko leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Ostapenko won the 2026 China Open second round 7-6(5) 7-5.

Latvia Age 29 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main-draw meetings
Spain Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jelena Ostapenko #32 7-6(5) 7-5 Paula Badosa #59 Match data Oct 3, 2026 R64 China Open WTA 1000 Hard
Jelena Ostapenko #11 3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 Paula Badosa #40 Match data Aug 9, 2024* R32 Canadian Open WTA 1000 Hard
Jelena Ostapenko #20 6-2 4-6 6-3 Paula Badosa #35 Match data May 18, 2023* QF Italian Open WTA 1000 Clay
Paula Badosa #9 7-6(1) 6-1 Jelena Ostapenko #28 Match data Jan 12, 2022* R32 Sydney International WTA 500 Hard
Jelena Ostapenko #53 6-2 6-2 Paula Badosa #70 Match data Mar 18, 2021* R32 St. Petersburg WTA 500 Hard
Paula Badosa #87 6-4 6-3 Jelena Ostapenko #43 Match data Oct 3, 2020* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Ostapenko #26 #5 5,611 2,022 300 224 57.3% 1 0 0 5 3 9
Paula Badosa #61 #2 5,045 2,039 184 119 60.7% 0 1 0 2 1 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Paula Badosa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2014 1–1 50.0% #271 1,505 0 0 2015 2–3 40.0% #230 1,522 0 0
18 2015 6–5 54.5% #84 1,563 0 0 2016 0–3 0.0% #313 1,477 0 0
19 2016 20–24 45.5% #44 1,587 0 0 2017 0–1 0.0% #246 1,458 0 0
20 2017 43–20 68.3% #7 1,904 1 2 2018 2–2 50.0% #140 1,528 0 0
21 2018 23–21 52.3% #22 1,764 1 2 2019 7–9 43.8% #97 1,601 0 0
22 2019 25–26 49.0% #45 1,796 1 3 2020 7–4 63.6% #70 1,664 0 0
23 2020 8–7 53.3% #44 1,794 1 3 2021 43–17 71.7% #8 1,976 0 2
24 2021 31–19 62.0% #28 1,886 1 4 2022 31–21 59.6% #13 1,835 0 3
25 2022 31–19 62.0% #18 1,842 1 5 2023 17–10 63.0% #64 1,920 0 3
26 2023 38–22 63.3% #13 1,904 1 6 2024 37–18 67.3% #12 2,017 0 4
27 2024 29–18 61.7% #15 1,821 1 8 2025 17–11 60.7% #25 1,937 0 4
28 2025 18–20 47.4% #23 1,757 1 9 2026 21–20 51.2% #61 1,845 0 4
29 2026 27–22 55.1% #26 1,852 1 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Paula Badosa
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2015 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2017 22 14 36 61.1% 16 4 20 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2018 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 2019 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2019 18 16 34 52.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2020 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
23 2020 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 17 3 20 85.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 2021 18 13 31 58.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2022 20 14 34 58.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2022 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2023 5 5 10 50.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2023 23 16 39 59.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2024 26 11 37 70.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 2024 18 10 28 64.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2025 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2025 8 14 22 36.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2026 11 11 22 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2026 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 180 151 331 54.4% 63 47 110 57.3% 57 26 83 68.7% — 103 70 173 59.5% 63 33 96 65.6% 18 16 34 52.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 487/526 of Jelena Ostapenko's and 284/308 of Paula Badosa's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Paula Badosa
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2014 2/2 2.5 7.5 50.3% 64.2% 40.8% 59.2% 46.9% 52.5% 47.0% 2015 4/5 2.3 4.0 70.5% 63.4% 41.3% 56.3% 64.7% 57.1% 40.3%
18 2015 4/11 2.3 8.8 51.3% 68.6% 37.4% 46.0% 55.6% 53.2% 42.9% 2016 3/3 0.7 3.3 62.0% 60.2% 52.4% 52.4% 43.8% 57.0% 31.7%
19 2016 41/44 3.2 6.0 55.9% 63.9% 44.3% 46.5% 47.3% 55.3% 47.0% 2017 1/1 1.0 8.0 49.3% 55.9% 37.1% 53.8% 80.0% 46.4% 43.3%
20 2017 57/63 3.0 6.0 52.4% 66.3% 44.4% 52.2% 49.7% 55.7% 47.9% 2018 4/4 2.3 5.5 55.9% 60.1% 42.2% 51.1% 52.7% 52.4% 37.2%
21 2018 41/44 3.2 6.0 53.7% 62.2% 43.2% 44.4% 53.4% 53.9% 45.0% 2019 16/16 3.8 3.5 57.7% 68.3% 45.9% 53.9% 37.6% 58.1% 37.8%
22 2019 50/51 2.6 8.5 54.2% 65.5% 40.4% 49.4% 49.8% 53.8% 44.9% 2020 11/11 3.5 3.5 65.7% 65.8% 45.1% 48.4% 51.4% 58.6% 47.5%
23 2020 15/15 2.1 6.7 56.0% 63.0% 42.4% 52.5% 56.4% 54.3% 47.8% 2021 56/60 3.9 5.4 64.6% 69.8% 45.0% 56.2% 48.7% 61.0% 45.2%
24 2021 48/50 2.3 4.9 59.2% 65.5% 44.8% 47.2% 51.4% 57.3% 47.9% 2022 51/52 3.8 3.9 62.4% 66.1% 47.1% 52.7% 46.2% 59.2% 44.4%
25 2022 50/50 3.3 4.5 58.7% 65.7% 46.0% 51.8% 50.2% 57.5% 45.7% 2023 26/27 4.0 4.3 56.9% 69.6% 49.2% 58.1% 47.2% 60.6% 45.3%
26 2023 59/60 3.9 4.8 57.7% 67.9% 44.8% 53.0% 51.2% 58.0% 45.4% 2024 55/57 4.8 5.7 56.6% 71.2% 46.9% 63.8% 52.2% 60.3% 45.1%
27 2024 46/47 4.2 5.5 58.2% 67.2% 44.3% 53.9% 47.3% 57.6% 44.9% 2025 18/31 4.8 4.8 61.7% 71.7% 46.6% 57.2% 50.4% 62.4% 43.1%
28 2025 26/40 3.8 6.3 56.3% 64.1% 42.6% 45.4% 52.0% 54.8% 44.0% 2026 39/41 4.0 6.8 56.3% 67.9% 41.0% 50.9% 42.0% 56.1% 44.1%
29 2026 48/49 4.1 6.3 56.5% 68.9% 40.9% 52.4% 54.5% 56.9% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 487/526 3.3 5.9 56.2% 65.9% 43.5% 50.2% 50.8% 56.1% 45.9% — 284/308 4.0 5.0 60.1% 68.6% 45.7% 56.0% 47.8% 59.4% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Paula Badosa
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2014 1506 103.0 -0.95 -1.08 0.989 49.6% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.07 2015 1523 117.6 -0.54 -1.81 0.940 48.0% +27 — — 50.0% +0.38 — — — -0.19
18 2015 1564 113.6 -0.38 -0.84 0.917 48.0% +1 — — 51.9% +0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.31 2016 1477 96.2 -0.29 -3.37 0.738 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.43
19 2016 1588 129.6 -0.26 +3.66 1.052 51.1% -19 -57 +57 47.0% -0.01 5–9 (36%) 6–2 (75%) 100.1 +0.42 2017 1458 100.3 +0.14 -0.68 0.808 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
20 2017 1905 140.7 -0.06 +4.38 1.081 51.7% -121 -14 -156 61.0% +0.69 19–7 (73%) 8–7 (53%) 113.0 -0.70 2018 1529 108.0 -1.53 -3.44 0.782 45.8% — +71 — 50.0% +0.63 2–0 0–1 — +0.11
21 2018 1765 135.8 -1.97 +1.80 0.976 49.4% -46 +61 +98 52.5% -0.15 5–6 (45%) 11–3 (79%) 104.3 +1.89 2019 1602 111.9 +0.53 -2.84 0.902 48.2% -129 +66 +49 44.1% -0.59 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.03
22 2019 1797 138.3 -2.06 +2.13 0.973 49.4% -6 -63 +57 49.5% -0.12 10–7 (59%) 6–2 (75%) 105.6 +0.42 2020 1665 124.1 +1.36 +1.56 1.149 53.2% -156 +111 — 56.0% +0.92 3–0 (100%) — — +0.96
23 2020 1795 129.8 -1.03 +3.31 1.046 51.1% -14 -42 — 50.0% +0.33 1–1 0–2 — -0.12 2021 1976 151.5 +4.20 +2.86 1.159 52.9% -104 +26 -291 66.2% +1.16 16–6 (73%) 12–8 (60%) 111.9 -0.18
24 2021 1886 145.5 +0.96 +4.80 1.122 52.4% -58 -102 +128 60.3% +0.78 10–10 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.7 -0.11 2022 1836 154.6 +2.76 +2.01 1.087 51.9% +1 +145 -104 60.9% +0.69 9–5 (64%) 14–4 (78%) 106.3 +0.32
25 2022 1842 151.3 +0.61 +3.32 1.076 51.7% +25 -134 +215 56.9% +0.71 12–8 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 +0.07 2023 1921 154.7 +3.30 +2.60 1.150 52.7% -57 +106 — 65.5% +1.26 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 98.3 -0.83
26 2023 1905 154.5 +1.65 +2.98 1.082 51.8% -12 -121 +196 58.2% +0.74 19–11 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 106.0 -0.43 2024 2018 157.3 +3.81 +3.36 1.137 53.0% -7 -46 -166 65.6% +1.12 14–8 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.4 -0.98
27 2024 1821 149.7 +0.73 +1.92 1.057 51.4% +46 -10 +294 58.3% +0.57 9–5 (64%) 7–3 (70%) 103.5 +1.64 2025 1937 147.3 +3.89 +0.64 1.146 52.9% +54 +1 -91 60.9% +0.62 6–5 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 99.3 +0.71
28 2025 1757 150.0 -1.14 +1.24 0.972 49.2% -23 +167 +300 47.1% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 +0.90 2026 1846 140.8 -0.12 +0.51 1.003 50.2% +21 +122 -45 52.1% +0.14 6–7 (46%) 5–7 (42%) 93.0 -0.91
29 2026 1853 150.5 -0.11 +1.65 1.040 50.7% -34 +53 +188 55.8% +0.33 9–9 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 101.5 +1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2022 150.2 -0.09 +2.87 1.046 51.0% -25 -11 +134 55.0% +0.40 109–79 (58%) 64–46 (58%) 110.0 +1.10 — 2040 151.6 +2.64 +1.71 1.086 51.8% -24 +71 -112 60.2% +0.74 61–36 (63%) 49–34 (59%) 108.0 -0.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.