H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Jennifer Brady vs Ana Konjuh H2H: 0-1
Ana Konjuh holds a 1–0 lead over Jennifer Brady in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Konjuh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Konjuh won the 2016 Guangzhou quarterfinal 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 28
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2016* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Ana Konjuh | 6-4 7-5 | Jennifer Brady | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Brady | #618 | #13 | 3,840 | 1,942 | 72 | 76 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ana Konjuh | #647 | #20 | 1,830 | 1,786 | 84 | 80 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jennifer Brady | Ana Konjuh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #47 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #44 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1282 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #115 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,872 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |