H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Jennifer Brady vs Kateryna Baindl H2H: 1-1
Jennifer Brady and Kateryna Baindl are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jennifer Brady leads 1–0 on grass, while Kateryna Baindl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kateryna Baindl won the 2018 Guangzhou fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 32
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2019 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Jennifer Brady | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Kateryna Baindl | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2018* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kateryna Baindl | (w/o) | Jennifer Brady | Match data |
| Jul 4, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jennifer Brady | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-2 | Kateryna Baindl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Brady | #618 | #13 | 3,840 | 1,942 | 72 | 76 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kateryna Baindl | #467 | #62 | 922 | 1,730 | 75 | 107 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jennifer Brady | Kateryna Baindl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #140 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #102 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #115 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #91 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,872 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #144 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #99 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #132 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #445 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |