H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Ajla Tomljanovic H2H: 3-0
Jessica Pegula holds a 3–0 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jessica Pegula leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2025 Beijing second round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2025 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-0 6-3 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Apr 3, 2025 | Charleston | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Jessica Pegula | 6-3 6-2 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2025 | Austin | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Ajla Tomljanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |