H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Anhelina Kalinina H2H: 4-0
Jessica Pegula holds a 4–0 lead over Anhelina Kalinina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jessica Pegula leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2022 Roland Garros second round 6-1 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 29
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jessica Pegula | 6-1 5-7 6-4 | Anhelina Kalinina | Match data |
| May 12, 2022* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jessica Pegula | (w/o) | Anhelina Kalinina | Match data |
| Mar 30, 2022* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-0 (ret.) | Anhelina Kalinina | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2022* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 4-6 7-6(1) 7-5 | Anhelina Kalinina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Anhelina Kalinina | #59 | #25 | 1,677 | 1,901 | 96 | 106 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Anhelina Kalinina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #52 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,827 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #55 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #127 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |