H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:17 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Belinda Bencic H2H: 1-3
Belinda Bencic holds a 3–1 lead over Jessica Pegula in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Belinda Bencic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2026 Indian Wells fourth round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2026 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-3 7-6(5) | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2023* | Charleston | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Belinda Bencic | 7-5 7-6(5) | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 6-2 6-4 | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2015* | 's Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Belinda Bencic | 6-2 7-6(3) | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Belinda Bencic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |