H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Dayana Yastremska H2H: 1-0
Jessica Pegula holds a 1–0 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jessica Pegula leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2026 Brisbane fourth round 5-7 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2026 | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Dayana Yastremska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |