H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Naomi Osaka H2H: 1-1
Jessica Pegula and Naomi Osaka are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jessica Pegula leads 1–0 on clay, while Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2021 Rome third round 7-6(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2021* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jessica Pegula | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2019 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-3 7-6(5) | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Naomi Osaka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |