H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Sachia Vickery H2H: 0-1
Sachia Vickery holds a 1–0 lead over Jessica Pegula in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sachia Vickery leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sachia Vickery won the 2015 Charleston second round 4-6 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2015* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Sachia Vickery | 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Sachia Vickery | #417 | #73 | 833 | 1,699 | 38 | 56 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Sachia Vickery | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #138 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #101 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #157 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |