H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Simona Halep H2H: 1-1
Jessica Pegula and Simona Halep are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Simona Halep won the 2022 Toronto semifinal 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2022* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Simona Halep | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2021* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | (w/o) | Simona Halep | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Simona Halep | #873 | #1 | 8,290 | 2,111 | 446 | 197 | 69.4% | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Simona Halep | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #47 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #3 | 1,969 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 49–16 | 75.4% | #2 | 1,929 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 41–14 | 74.5% | #4 | 1,997 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #1 | 1,973 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 45–12 | 78.9% | #1 | 2,005 | 1 | 18 |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #4 | 1,938 | 2 | 19 |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 23–3 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,056 | 2 | 22 |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 2 | 22 |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #10 | 1,986 | 2 | 24 |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,913 | 2 | 24 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,887 | 2 | 24 |