H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:17 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Xinyu Wang H2H: 1-2
Xinyu Wang holds a 2–1 lead over Jessica Pegula in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Xinyu Wang leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2025 Indian Wells third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 24
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2025 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-2 6-1 | Xinyu Wang | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2024* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Xinyu Wang | 6-3 7-5 | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
| Jul 4, 2024* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Xinyu Wang | 6-4 6-7(7) 6-1 | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Xinyu Wang | #40 | #30 | 1,581 | 1,857 | 105 | 121 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Xinyu Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #86 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #40 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |