H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Yulia Putintseva H2H: 4-0
Jessica Pegula holds a 4–0 lead over Yulia Putintseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jessica Pegula leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2026 Charleston third round 4-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2026 | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Jessica Pegula | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2025 | Adelaide | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2023* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-4 6-4 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2022* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-3 6-3 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Yulia Putintseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |