H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jie Zheng vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 2-2

Jie Zheng and Gisela Dulko are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jie Zheng leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2009 Monterrey Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jie Zheng
CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Gisela Dulko
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jie Zheng #18 6-3 6-2 Gisela Dulko #36 Match data Mar 7, 2009* QF Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Gisela Dulko #50 6-3 6-3 Jie Zheng #24 Match data Jan 14, 2009* R16 Hobart International International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Gisela Dulko #39 6-2 6-1 Jie Zheng #69 Match data Apr 30, 2005* QF Estoril Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Jie Zheng #82 6-2 6-0 Gisela Dulko #34 Match data Jan 16, 2005* F Hobart International Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,906 218 196 52.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,797 192 181 51.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jie Zheng Gisela Dulko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,527 0 0
18 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,506 0 0 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0
19 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0 2004 22–19 53.7% #33 1,705 0 0
20 2004 10–18 35.7% #79 1,546 0 0 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,725 0 0
21 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,702 0 1 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0
22 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,777 0 3 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,698 0 2
23 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3 2008 18–21 46.2% #51 1,629 0 3
24 2008 22–11 66.7% #25 1,845 0 3 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,730 0 3
25 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,782 0 3 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,687 0 3
26 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,762 0 3 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,651 0 4
27 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,605 0 4
28 2012 25–24 51.0% #26 1,652 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,687 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jie Zheng Gisela Dulko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2003 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 20 16 36 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
21 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 2006 12 9 21 57.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 3 13 16 18.8% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2009 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2009 19 13 32 59.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2010 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 6 11 17 35.3% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — —
27 2011 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 17 15 32 53.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143 126 269 53.2% 48 44 92 52.2% 24 22 46 52.2% 3 4 7 42.9% — 95 107 202 47.0% 81 58 139 58.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 286/397 of Jie Zheng's and 229/365 of Gisela Dulko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jie Zheng Gisela Dulko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/12 2.0 5.0 57.5% 58.5% 47.9% 57.1% 30.8% 54.0% 40.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 9/41 3.0 4.9 55.9% 67.7% 45.0% 46.7% 55.4% 58.0% 42.7%
20 2004 5/28 0.2 3.2 67.1% 53.1% 34.7% 39.7% 34.3% 47.4% 39.7% 2005 6/55 2.3 4.8 56.5% 59.6% 39.2% 49.8% 44.7% 50.9% 48.8%
21 2005 3/39 0.3 1.7 73.6% 54.5% 45.8% 58.2% 43.9% 52.9% 38.8% 2006 26/39 1.5 4.9 59.7% 59.1% 42.3% 49.9% 52.7% 52.2% 42.9%
22 2006 24/41 0.5 2.0 72.3% 57.7% 47.0% 48.1% 46.4% 54.3% 46.5% 2007 36/52 1.0 4.3 61.7% 58.4% 42.9% 47.3% 47.6% 52.4% 43.2%
23 2007 16/17 0.5 1.8 71.3% 62.6% 45.3% 56.9% 44.4% 57.9% 45.5% 2008 35/39 1.4 3.5 61.9% 59.3% 47.2% 48.7% 48.3% 54.7% 43.0%
24 2008 24/33 1.2 2.0 64.9% 62.6% 48.5% 56.7% 50.6% 57.3% 47.3% 2009 44/48 2.7 4.2 58.1% 66.0% 44.8% 56.5% 48.7% 56.8% 44.9%
25 2009 44/48 0.6 2.2 70.2% 61.5% 47.3% 51.4% 52.7% 57.3% 45.8% 2010 39/42 2.3 3.8 60.6% 60.6% 46.5% 50.4% 51.1% 55.0% 46.3%
26 2010 39/41 0.5 2.8 69.7% 57.6% 43.9% 55.1% 47.7% 53.4% 45.3% 2011 28/30 2.0 4.3 57.2% 65.6% 43.9% 55.2% 49.5% 56.4% 45.7%
27 2011 36/41 0.3 2.5 73.5% 57.0% 40.0% 48.0% 48.8% 52.5% 42.9% 2012 5/7 0.6 5.0 52.5% 48.8% 36.6% 30.4% 34.6% 43.0% 40.8%
28 2012 38/49 0.5 2.4 68.6% 60.5% 46.7% 49.0% 51.9% 56.3% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 33/34 0.4 2.7 70.4% 56.4% 44.3% 47.0% 46.9% 52.9% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 23/25 0.3 2.0 70.5% 57.6% 42.9% 53.2% 57.7% 53.1% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1/1 0.0 3.0 64.7% 48.5% 27.8% 61.5% 14.3% 41.2% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286/414 0.5 2.3 70.1% 58.9% 44.8% 51.2% 49.4% 54.7% 44.9% — 229/373 1.9 4.2 59.5% 61.5% 44.5% 50.8% 49.2% 54.5% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jie Zheng Gisela Dulko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1488 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1528 110.5 — — — — -9 +54 — 46.7% +0.27 2–1 (67%) — — +0.54
18 2002 1507 104.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 1–1 — +0.03 2003 1516 103.4 -0.14 -1.46 0.874 47.6% -8 +76 — 36.0% -0.44 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.3 +0.47
19 2003 1536 113.8 — — — — +24 — — 51.6% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.41 2004 1706 135.1 +1.79 -0.44 1.017 50.3% -27 -95 -100 52.9% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 9–1 (90%) 106.2 -0.94
20 2004 1547 127.3 -2.88 -1.53 0.755 43.6% +22 +39 -34 39.7% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 2–0 — +0.21 2005 1725 129.6 -1.55 +1.29 0.994 49.6% -23 -48 -80 55.8% +0.32 11–8 (58%) 7–5 (58%) 105.8 +0.73
21 2005 1702 131.1 -0.46 -1.44 0.823 45.8% -19 -40 — 55.4% +0.42 11–5 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 107.3 -0.22 2006 1574 115.8 -2.53 -1.31 0.898 47.8% +11 +73 +112 44.0% -0.75 3–5 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 98.0 +1.89
22 2006 1778 132.0 -1.03 +1.40 1.019 50.5% -50 -22 -207 58.9% +0.37 7–8 (47%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 -0.42 2007 1699 129.5 -2.86 -0.86 0.906 47.9% +7 -19 — 53.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–3 (67%) 104.8 +0.85
23 2007 1690 124.7 +1.30 +1.45 1.082 51.4% -13 +33 — 45.9% -0.08 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.7 -0.24 2008 1630 120.3 -0.30 -0.40 0.950 49.0% -74 +137 +31 46.3% -0.11 7–3 (70%) 4–6 (40%) 103.7 -1.13
24 2008 1845 147.4 +1.86 +3.35 1.109 52.4% -68 -101 -119 59.7% +1.01 7–1 (88%) 2–3 (40%) 107.4 -2.42 2009 1731 135.0 +0.97 +0.64 1.040 50.8% -69 +46 -30 55.7% +0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.2 -0.13
25 2009 1782 142.7 +1.41 +2.49 1.073 51.6% +25 -47 -70 54.5% +0.39 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 104.2 -0.17 2010 1687 136.7 -0.13 +2.36 1.028 50.5% -9 +74 — 49.5% -0.11 7–8 (47%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 -1.55
26 2010 1763 139.6 -1.89 +1.53 0.971 49.4% +49 -45 -75 52.6% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 7–0 (100%) 106.1 +0.54 2011 1652 134.5 +0.74 +1.84 1.047 50.8% -36 +153 — 51.6% +0.16 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 -0.48
27 2011 1705 120.3 -2.95 -0.51 0.903 47.7% +56 -98 -88 43.9% -0.58 9–9 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.59 2012 1606 102.0 -2.95 +0.27 0.715 41.8% -21 — — 15.4% -2.54 1–0 0–1 — -0.18
28 2012 1653 131.5 +0.57 +1.44 1.024 50.6% +36 -75 +52 49.5% -0.10 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.4 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1688 126.6 -2.38 +0.84 0.941 48.5% -1 -50 — 47.5% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 107.5 +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1670 119.0 -1.86 +0.63 0.939 48.7% -33 -52 +57 46.2% -0.42 2–2 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.8 -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1648 95.9 -0.62 -1.23 0.644 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1906 137.9 -0.68 +1.30 0.991 49.8% +7 -35 -39 50.9% +0.03 73–58 (56%) 47–31 (60%) 109.8 -0.49 — 1798 133.1 -0.56 +0.42 0.974 49.4% -23 +50 -10 50.4% -0.03 54–43 (56%) 44–40 (52%) 107.2 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.