Jie Zheng
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 10 | 11 | Mar 20, 2013 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 8, 2013 | H2H |
| Na Li | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 8, 2014 | H2H |
| Maria Kirilenko | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 2, 2013 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 24, 2013 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Jie Zheng holds a 4–3 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Jie Zheng leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2013 China Open round of 64 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Kirilenko | 7-5 6-2 | Jie Zheng | Match data | Oct 2, 2013* | R64 | China Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Maria Kirilenko | 6-2 7-5 | Jie Zheng | Match data | May 9, 2012* | R64 | Madrid Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Maria Kirilenko | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Jie Zheng | Match data | Feb 15, 2012* | R64 | Qatar Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Jie Zheng | 6-1 6-3 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data | Jan 28, 2010* | QF | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Jie Zheng | 6-4 6-4 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data | May 11, 2009 | R64 | Madrid Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Jie Zheng | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data | May 28, 2008* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Jie Zheng | 6-3 6-7(10) 6-1 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data | Oct 1, 2005* | QF | Guangzhou Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,906 | 218 | 196 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,918 | 286 | 230 | 55.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Maria Kirilenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2004 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,724 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2008 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,848 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,791 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,715 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2012 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #26 | 1,652 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,687 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Maria Kirilenko | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 19 | 2003 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2006 | 17 | 17 | 34 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2004 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2007 | 24 | 17 | 41 | 58.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 2005 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 19 | 17 | 36 | 52.8% | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2009 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2010 | 27 | 16 | 43 | 62.8% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 21 | 16 | 37 | 56.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 24 | 13 | 37 | 64.9% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 143 | 126 | 269 | 53.2% | 48 | 44 | 92 | 52.2% | 24 | 22 | 46 | 52.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | 203 | 151 | 354 | 57.3% | 56 | 46 | 102 | 54.9% | 23 | 28 | 51 | 45.1% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 286/397 of Jie Zheng's and 385/513 of Maria Kirilenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Maria Kirilenko | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3/10 | 0.7 | 4.7 | 67.0% | 62.0% | 54.6% | 48.5% | 58.2% | 59.5% | 41.0% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3/17 | 1.7 | 6.7 | 58.3% | 62.1% | 49.2% | 53.1% | 46.4% | 56.7% | 42.0% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 9/50 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 59.7% | 57.9% | 43.6% | 52.4% | 52.3% | 52.4% | 35.9% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 34/48 | 2.3 | 4.6 | 60.9% | 63.7% | 45.3% | 51.9% | 41.2% | 56.5% | 44.6% |
| 20 | 2004 | 5/28 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 67.1% | 53.1% | 34.7% | 39.7% | 34.3% | 47.4% | 39.7% | 2007 | 47/54 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 65.8% | 64.6% | 48.1% | 52.4% | 46.7% | 58.8% | 45.3% |
| 21 | 2005 | 3/39 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 73.6% | 54.5% | 45.8% | 58.2% | 43.9% | 52.9% | 38.8% | 2008 | 45/56 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 67.5% | 61.8% | 47.0% | 51.0% | 49.8% | 57.0% | 46.5% |
| 22 | 2006 | 24/41 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 72.3% | 57.7% | 47.0% | 48.1% | 46.4% | 54.3% | 46.5% | 2009 | 42/45 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 63.3% | 61.6% | 45.0% | 49.9% | 46.5% | 55.6% | 43.5% |
| 23 | 2007 | 16/17 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 71.3% | 62.6% | 45.3% | 56.9% | 44.4% | 57.9% | 45.5% | 2010 | 56/60 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 65.1% | 64.4% | 48.9% | 51.5% | 46.6% | 59.0% | 46.4% |
| 24 | 2008 | 24/33 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 64.9% | 62.6% | 48.5% | 56.7% | 50.6% | 57.3% | 47.3% | 2011 | 47/52 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 69.1% | 62.7% | 49.8% | 48.9% | 51.8% | 58.6% | 47.3% |
| 25 | 2009 | 44/48 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 70.2% | 61.5% | 47.3% | 51.4% | 52.7% | 57.3% | 45.8% | 2012 | 41/55 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 65.0% | 65.3% | 44.9% | 52.7% | 49.7% | 58.2% | 44.6% |
| 26 | 2010 | 39/41 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 69.7% | 57.6% | 43.9% | 55.1% | 47.7% | 53.4% | 45.3% | 2013 | 46/52 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 59.5% | 64.8% | 49.8% | 56.9% | 44.3% | 58.9% | 43.5% |
| 27 | 2011 | 36/41 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 73.5% | 57.0% | 40.0% | 48.0% | 48.8% | 52.5% | 42.9% | 2014 | 12/14 | 2.2 | 3.6 | 64.6% | 59.2% | 36.4% | 48.8% | 39.3% | 50.9% | 41.6% |
| 28 | 2012 | 38/49 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 68.6% | 60.5% | 46.7% | 49.0% | 51.9% | 56.3% | 44.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 33/34 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 70.4% | 56.4% | 44.3% | 47.0% | 46.9% | 52.9% | 44.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 23/25 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 70.5% | 57.6% | 42.9% | 53.2% | 57.7% | 53.1% | 44.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 64.7% | 48.5% | 27.8% | 61.5% | 14.3% | 41.2% | 37.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 286/414 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 70.1% | 58.9% | 44.8% | 51.2% | 49.4% | 54.7% | 44.9% | — | 385/516 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 64.5% | 63.3% | 47.2% | 51.8% | 47.2% | 57.6% | 44.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jie Zheng | Maria Kirilenko | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1479 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.52 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1522 | 108.4 | +0.26 | -0.99 | 1.013 | 51.2% | +31 | — | — | 43.5% | -0.70 | 3–0 (100%) | 2–1 (67%) | 105.9 | +0.35 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1576 | 122.0 | -0.20 | -0.34 | 0.970 | 49.9% | +27 | — | -41 | 50.0% | -0.11 | 1–3 (25%) | 4–3 (57%) | 99.2 | -0.38 |
| 18 | 2002 | 1507 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.03 | 2005 | 1741 | 139.7 | -0.75 | -3.22 | 0.755 | 44.4% | +24 | -184 | -189 | 57.5% | +0.42 | 5–5 (50%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.8 | -0.06 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1536 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 51.6% | +0.06 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.41 | 2006 | 1657 | 138.5 | +0.48 | +1.03 | 1.025 | 50.5% | +25 | -46 | — | 49.0% | -0.22 | 3–9 (25%) | 3–5 (38%) | 93.8 | +0.13 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1547 | 127.3 | -2.88 | -1.53 | 0.755 | 43.6% | +22 | +39 | -34 | 39.7% | -0.48 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–0 | — | +0.21 | 2007 | 1740 | 140.8 | +3.14 | +1.31 | 1.100 | 52.1% | +5 | -194 | -199 | 54.4% | +0.57 | 7–12 (37%) | 4–3 (57%) | 97.2 | -0.64 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1702 | 131.1 | -0.46 | -1.44 | 0.823 | 45.8% | -19 | -40 | — | 55.4% | +0.42 | 11–5 (69%) | 4–3 (57%) | 107.3 | -0.22 | 2008 | 1725 | 136.8 | +1.27 | +1.62 | 1.084 | 51.7% | -38 | +93 | — | 57.4% | +0.66 | 14–12 (54%) | 2–5 (29%) | 99.4 | +2.04 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1778 | 132.0 | -1.03 | +1.40 | 1.019 | 50.5% | -50 | -22 | -207 | 58.9% | +0.37 | 7–8 (47%) | 8–3 (73%) | 103.8 | -0.42 | 2009 | 1720 | 129.5 | +0.33 | -0.34 | 0.978 | 49.6% | -26 | +33 | -218 | 45.8% | -0.10 | 8–4 (67%) | 2–4 (33%) | 102.2 | -1.07 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1690 | 124.7 | +1.30 | +1.45 | 1.082 | 51.4% | -13 | +33 | — | 45.9% | -0.08 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–3 (0%) | 91.7 | -0.24 | 2010 | 1830 | 151.8 | +3.21 | +2.46 | 1.133 | 52.6% | -13 | -36 | -271 | 60.2% | +0.86 | 11–8 (58%) | 4–5 (44%) | 103.5 | +1.69 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1845 | 147.4 | +1.86 | +3.35 | 1.109 | 52.4% | -68 | -101 | -119 | 59.7% | +1.01 | 7–1 (88%) | 2–3 (40%) | 107.4 | -2.42 | 2011 | 1848 | 143.7 | +2.41 | +3.15 | 1.143 | 52.8% | 0 | -89 | -260 | 56.6% | +0.67 | 7–10 (41%) | 6–4 (60%) | 96.7 | +0.59 |
| 25 | 2009 | 1782 | 142.7 | +1.41 | +2.49 | 1.073 | 51.6% | +25 | -47 | -70 | 54.5% | +0.39 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | 104.2 | -0.17 | 2012 | 1798 | 144.6 | +2.23 | +1.06 | 1.066 | 51.4% | +18 | -110 | -42 | 60.0% | +0.85 | 8–9 (47%) | 10–5 (67%) | 99.8 | -0.37 |
| 26 | 2010 | 1763 | 139.6 | -1.89 | +1.53 | 0.971 | 49.4% | +49 | -45 | -75 | 52.6% | -0.01 | 9–6 (60%) | 7–0 (100%) | 106.1 | +0.54 | 2013 | 1791 | 145.9 | +2.97 | +0.16 | 1.057 | 51.1% | +16 | +6 | -68 | 63.0% | +1.01 | 10–2 (83%) | 7–3 (70%) | 108.1 | +0.73 |
| 27 | 2011 | 1705 | 120.3 | -2.95 | -0.51 | 0.903 | 47.7% | +56 | -98 | -88 | 43.9% | -0.58 | 9–9 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | 95.0 | +0.59 | 2014 | 1715 | 111.8 | -3.39 | -0.94 | 0.847 | 46.1% | +74 | +12 | -13 | 36.7% | -1.07 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.2 | -0.37 |
| 28 | 2012 | 1653 | 131.5 | +0.57 | +1.44 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +36 | -75 | +52 | 49.5% | -0.10 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.4 | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 1688 | 126.6 | -2.38 | +0.84 | 0.941 | 48.5% | -1 | -50 | — | 47.5% | -0.36 | 8–4 (67%) | 5–3 (63%) | 107.5 | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 1670 | 119.0 | -1.86 | +0.63 | 0.939 | 48.7% | -33 | -52 | +57 | 46.2% | -0.42 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–1 (83%) | 101.8 | -0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 1648 | 95.9 | -0.62 | -1.23 | 0.644 | 39.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1906 | 137.9 | -0.68 | +1.30 | 0.991 | 49.8% | +7 | -35 | -39 | 50.9% | +0.03 | 73–58 (56%) | 47–31 (60%) | 109.8 | -0.49 | — | 1919 | 145.3 | +1.84 | +1.16 | 1.058 | 51.2% | +5 | -27 | -136 | 55.0% | +0.44 | 80–75 (52%) | 50–45 (53%) | 101.9 | +0.41 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 10 | 11 | Mar 20, 2013 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 8, 2013 | H2H |
| Na Li | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 8, 2014 | H2H |
| Maria Kirilenko | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 2, 2013 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 24, 2013 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 3 | 6 | 9 | Mar 12, 2013 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 4 | 5 | 9 | Oct 29, 2012 | H2H |
| Klara Koukalova | 5 | 3 | 8 | Sep 19, 2014 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 27, 2014 | H2H |
| Serena Williams | 0 | 8 | 8 | Oct 4, 2013 | H2H |