H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jie Zheng vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 4-3

Jie Zheng holds a 4–3 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Jie Zheng leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2013 Beijing second round 7-5 6-2.

CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 2, 2013* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Maria Kirilenko #18 7-5 6-2 Jie Zheng #54 Match data
May 9, 2012* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Maria Kirilenko #19 6-2 7-5 Jie Zheng #33 Match data
Feb 15, 2012* Doha WTA 1000 R64 Hard Maria Kirilenko #25 6-3 3-6 6-3 Jie Zheng #33 Match data
Jan 28, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Jie Zheng #35 6-1 6-3 Maria Kirilenko #58 Match data
May 13, 2009* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Jie Zheng #16 6-4 6-4 Maria Kirilenko #41 Match data
May 28, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Jie Zheng #200 4-6 6-3 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #23 Match data
Oct 1, 2005* Guangzhou WTA 500 QF Hard Jie Zheng #47 6-3 6-7(10) 6-1 Maria Kirilenko #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,898 216 193 52.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,910 282 228 55.3% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jie Zheng Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,507 0 0 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,741 0 1
19 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,656 0 1
20 2004 10–17 37.0% #79 1,551 0 0 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2
21 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,705 0 1 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,722 0 5
22 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,778 0 3 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,719 0 5
23 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,827 0 5
24 2008 20–10 66.7% #25 1,838 0 3 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,816 0 5
25 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,779 0 3 2012 29–20 59.2% #14 1,775 0 5
26 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,760 0 3 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,786 0 6
27 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,698 0 6
28 2012 25–23 52.1% #26 1,658 0 4
29 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,688 0 4
30 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4
31 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4