H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Jie Zheng vs Na Li H2H: 3-4

Na Li holds a 4–3 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Na Li leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2014 Madrid third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jie Zheng
CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 8, 2014* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Na Li #2 6-2 6-3 Jie Zheng #60 Match data
Mar 5, 2014* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Na Li #2 6-1 7-5 Jie Zheng #58 Match data
May 16, 2013* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Na Li #5 6-3 6-1 Jie Zheng #50 Match data
Mar 8, 2012* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Na Li #8 6-1 6-3 Jie Zheng #34 Match data
May 7, 2006* Estoril WTA 250 F Clay Jie Zheng #49 6-7(5) 7-5 (ret.) Na Li #70 Match data
May 7, 2005* Rabat WTA 250 SF Clay Jie Zheng #65 3-3 (ret.) Na Li #35 Match data
Jan 15, 2005* Hobart WTA 250 SF Hard Jie Zheng #82 3-6 6-4 6-0 Na Li #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,898 216 193 52.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jie Zheng Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,507 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0
19 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0
20 2004 10–17 37.0% #79 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,705 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,778 0 3 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1
23 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1
24 2008 20–10 66.7% #25 1,838 0 3 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1
25 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,779 0 3 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,760 0 3 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2
27 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2
28 2012 25–23 52.1% #26 1,658 0 4 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3
29 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,688 0 4 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5
30 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6
31 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7
32 — — — — — — — 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9