H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jill Craybas vs Katie Obrien H2H: 1-0
Jill Craybas holds a 1–0 lead over Katie Obrien in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2010 Roland Garros first round 6-0 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jill Craybas | 6-0 4-6 6-2 | Katie Obrien | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Katie Obrien | #782 | #84 | 769 | 1,514 | 9 | 34 | 20.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jill Craybas | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #127 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #88 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #179 | 1,371 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,366 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |