H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jo Durie vs Elise Burgin H2H: 5-0

Jo Durie holds a 5–0 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jo Durie leads 4–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1988 Birmingham round of 64 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jo Durie
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main-draw meetings
Elise Burgin
USA Age 64 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jo Durie #74 7-5 7-6 Elise Burgin #86 Match data Jun 8, 1988* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Jo Durie #56 7-5 7-5 Elise Burgin Match data Jun 30, 1985* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jo Durie #20 6-4 6-7 7-5 Elise Burgin #42 Match data Nov 21, 1984* R64 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Jo Durie #15 6-2 6-1 Elise Burgin #58 Match data Oct 27, 1984* R16 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Jo Durie #14 6-1 6-3 Elise Burgin #45 Match data Jun 29, 1984* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,101 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Elise Burgin #768 #27 20 1,845 132 165 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jo Durie Elise Burgin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,619 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
19 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,733 0 4 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,509 0 0
20 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,859 0 7 1982 7–10 41.2% — 1,584 0 0
21 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7 1983 13–9 59.1% — 1,743 0 0
22 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,094 0 9 1984 9–15 37.5% #51 1,715 0 0
23 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,890 0 9 1985 29–23 55.8% #52 1,772 0 0
24 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9 1986 25–22 53.2% #40 1,775 0 1
25 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,841 0 9 1987 17–21 44.7% #66 1,703 0 1
26 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9 1988 5–12 29.4% #108 1,629 0 1
27 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,702 0 9 1989 16–19 45.7% #62 1,700 0 1
28 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9 1990 7–19 26.9% #149 1,569 0 1
29 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9 1991 0–3 0.0% #299 1,527 0 1
30 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9 1992 2–5 28.6% #166 1,523 0 1
31 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9 1993 0–2 0.0% #400 1,496 0 1
32 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jo Durie Elise Burgin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1983 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1985 11 8 19 57.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
26 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1988 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 9 11 20 45.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 5 12 17 29.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5% — 64 77 141 45.4% 34 30 64 53.1% 26 34 60 43.3% 8 24 32 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jo Durie Elise Burgin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +94 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1977 1602 121.5 — — — — — -35 +40 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +18 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +2.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 1714 129.5 — — — — — -76 -94 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.87 1980 1476 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20
19 1980 1734 122.7 — — — — -184 -10 -56 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.68 1981 1509 111.3 — — — — +69 — — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — -0.26
20 1981 1859 136.3 — — — — -159 -77 -116 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -0.98 1982 1584 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.8% -1.19 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 105.6 -0.34
21 1982 1841 141.1 — — — — -59 -75 -37 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -2.62 1983 1743 128.0 — — — — +6 — -177 54.0% +0.10 5–1 (83%) 2–0 — -0.95
22 1983 2095 159.8 — — — — -75 -184 -99 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.64 1984 1716 125.3 — — — — -22 — -103 37.5% -0.88 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 105.2 -2.38
23 1984 1891 136.3 — — — — +11 -59 +84 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.18 1985 1773 137.6 — — — — -63 -51 -73 51.7% +0.03 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 106.3 -1.48
24 1985 1800 133.3 — — — — +15 -48 +123 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.37 1986 1776 142.7 — — — — -21 +19 -104 53.2% +0.25 7–8 (47%) 4–4 (50%) 98.8 -2.16
25 1986 1842 140.0 — — — — +2 -79 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -3.56 1987 1703 130.2 — — — — -19 +39 +12 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 5–4 (56%) 98.4 -1.73
26 1987 1741 134.1 — — — — +30 -30 +108 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.3 -2.72 1988 1629 115.8 — — — — +13 — +21 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 95.2 -0.25
27 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — -1 -16 +119 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.26 1989 1701 132.4 — — — — -21 +34 -81 47.6% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.1 -1.05
28 1989 1622 126.0 — — — — -8 — +201 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.38 1990 1569 112.5 — — — — -10 +144 +32 32.8% -1.49 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.2 -1.68
29 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04 1991 1528 99.7 — — — — -19 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.25
30 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +4 -111 +94 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02 1992 1524 109.4 — — — — 0 +174 — 37.5% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.25
31 1992 1689 130.7 — — — — -48 -50 +162 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39 1993 1496 97.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.02
32 1993 1563 107.8 — — — — -11 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1548 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2101 141.6 — — — — -26 -67 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.68 — 1846 134.3 — — — — -16 +27 -61 44.7% -0.47 47–47 (50%) 32–28 (53%) 102.8 -3.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.