Jodie Burrage
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Korpatsch | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 16, 2024 | H2H |
| Caty Mcnally | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 15, 2025 | H2H |
| Ankita Raina | 2 | 0 | 2 | Oct 19, 2023 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 20, 2023 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Jodie Burrage vs Tereza Martincova H2H: 1-0
Jodie Burrage holds a 1–0 lead over Tereza Martincova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jodie Burrage leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jodie Burrage won the 2023 Nottingham Open first round 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jodie Burrage | 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(4) | Tereza Martincova | Match data | Jun 15, 2023* | R32 | Nottingham Open | WTA 250 | Grass |
| Tereza Martincova | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Jodie Burrage | Match data | Nov 7, 2020 | Q1 | Linz Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jodie Burrage | #492 | #85 | 844 | 1,628 | 18 | 26 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tereza Martincova | #320 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,791 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jodie Burrage | Tereza Martincova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #261 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #320 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jodie Burrage | Tereza Martincova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2017 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2022 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2018 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2023 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2019 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2024 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2025 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2021 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14 | 17 | 31 | 45.2% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | — | 50 | 66 | 116 | 43.1% | 10 | 21 | 31 | 32.3% | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 36/44 of Jodie Burrage's and 167/173 of Tereza Martincova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jodie Burrage | Tereza Martincova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2/3 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 72.5% | 60.3% | 46.7% | 22.2% | 55.6% | 56.5% | 47.6% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2/3 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 64.9% | 49.1% | 40.5% | 46.6% | 45.8% | 46.4% | 40.1% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3/3 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 77.0% | 53.9% | 53.8% | 47.4% | 50.0% | 53.5% | 49.3% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10/11 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 68.0% | 56.7% | 44.1% | 44.9% | 53.3% | 52.8% | 40.5% |
| 22 | 2021 | 4/4 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 57.2% | 63.3% | 29.0% | 32.6% | 46.1% | 49.0% | 39.4% | 2017 | 12/12 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 67.4% | 58.3% | 45.0% | 56.9% | 42.9% | 53.5% | 41.4% |
| 23 | 2022 | 8/8 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 60.2% | 69.2% | 43.0% | 49.1% | 40.7% | 58.5% | 37.0% | 2018 | 8/8 | 0.6 | 2.8 | 68.1% | 54.6% | 44.4% | 46.9% | 40.8% | 51.3% | 37.1% |
| 24 | 2023 | 18/18 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 60.5% | 61.9% | 43.9% | 48.1% | 53.4% | 54.8% | 41.7% | 2019 | 9/9 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 69.7% | 61.3% | 45.9% | 57.7% | 41.1% | 56.3% | 41.5% |
| 25 | 2024 | 4/4 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 64.5% | 63.0% | 43.5% | 61.0% | 54.6% | 56.5% | 43.4% | 2020 | 11/11 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 74.4% | 60.9% | 43.8% | 51.0% | 41.6% | 55.7% | 42.6% |
| 26 | 2025 | 2/10 | 6.5 | 4.0 | 57.1% | 70.4% | 22.3% | 40.2% | 75.0% | 49.9% | 33.2% | 2021 | 45/47 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 68.5% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 50.3% | 48.0% | 56.9% | 44.6% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 41/42 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 71.2% | 61.3% | 44.4% | 49.2% | 43.5% | 56.3% | 40.6% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 19/19 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 72.7% | 57.8% | 40.9% | 41.4% | 42.1% | 53.1% | 42.8% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 6.5 | 73.5% | 54.7% | 36.4% | 60.0% | 19.2% | 49.8% | 39.3% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 3/3 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 80.9% | 48.7% | 47.6% | 37.0% | 65.7% | 48.4% | 38.9% |
| Career | — | 36/44 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 60.3% | 64.3% | 40.8% | 47.6% | 51.1% | 54.9% | 40.1% | — | 167/173 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 70.4% | 59.3% | 45.5% | 48.9% | 45.1% | 55.0% | 42.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jodie Burrage | Tereza Martincova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1490 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 1474 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1484 | 97.7 | -0.07 | -0.99 | 1.094 | 51.8% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -0.57 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.40 |
| 19 | 2018 | 1457 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1450 | 95.1 | -2.66 | -1.09 | 0.747 | 43.4% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.14 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1480 | 106.8 | -1.60 | +1.58 | 1.060 | 51.4% | — | +39 | — | 62.5% | +1.00 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.12 |
| 21 | 2020 | 1450 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1533 | 103.8 | -2.52 | -1.30 | 0.859 | 46.8% | +18 | — | — | 44.0% | -0.72 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.77 |
| 22 | 2021 | 1463 | 104.4 | -3.26 | -1.92 | 0.773 | 44.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.30 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.15 | 2017 | 1562 | 109.3 | -2.11 | -1.08 | 0.891 | 47.6% | +5 | -31 | — | 46.4% | -0.75 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–0 | — | -0.26 |
| 23 | 2022 | 1531 | 104.8 | +0.38 | -2.94 | 0.892 | 47.8% | — | — | -8 | 47.1% | -0.82 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.10 | 2018 | 1475 | 101.7 | -2.73 | -4.64 | 0.762 | 44.9% | +73 | — | — | 22.2% | -1.83 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.86 |
| 24 | 2023 | 1576 | 112.6 | -0.55 | -1.56 | 0.921 | 48.2% | -79 | — | +84 | 48.8% | -0.49 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.6 | +0.66 | 2019 | 1518 | 110.4 | +0.36 | +0.13 | 0.948 | 48.8% | +26 | — | — | 27.3% | -0.77 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–4 (0%) | 97.6 | +0.06 |
| 25 | 2024 | 1595 | 113.2 | -1.05 | -1.76 | 0.997 | 50.0% | -89 | — | — | 55.6% | -0.22 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.31 | 2020 | 1655 | 123.4 | -0.98 | -0.18 | 0.963 | 49.3% | -71 | -35 | — | 52.0% | +0.16 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–1 | — | +0.83 |
| 26 | 2025 | 1507 | 113.9 | -1.18 | -1.18 | 0.662 | 42.2% | -33 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.87 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–2 | — | -0.36 | 2021 | 1775 | 133.4 | +0.30 | +1.02 | 1.033 | 50.8% | -16 | -257 | -15 | 56.4% | +0.47 | 10–3 (77%) | 8–3 (73%) | 112.3 | +1.00 |
| 27 | 2026 | 1475 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1740 | 135.3 | -0.74 | -1.05 | 0.929 | 48.5% | +25 | -239 | -30 | 39.3% | -0.60 | 6–5 (55%) | 6–13 (32%) | 95.7 | -1.38 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1637 | 112.3 | -2.77 | 0.00 | 0.911 | 47.8% | +24 | -73 | +23 | 32.6% | -1.00 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–7 (13%) | 91.4 | +0.24 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1578 | 104.9 | -2.70 | -3.04 | 0.783 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.20 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1574 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1582 | 103.0 | -1.35 | -1.96 | 0.754 | 44.2% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.36 |
| Career | — | 1628 | 111.8 | -0.74 | -1.91 | 0.889 | 47.5% | -64 | — | +50 | 43.7% | -0.79 | 6–9 (40%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.1 | +0.82 | — | 1792 | 121.3 | -1.01 | -0.43 | 0.937 | 48.7% | +7 | -119 | -11 | 42.5% | -0.44 | 31–29 (52%) | 20–33 (38%) | 96.0 | +1.23 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Tereza Martincova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | 2 | 4 | 6 | Feb 2, 2023 | H2H |
| Barbora Krejcikova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 23, 2023 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 8, 2022 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 7, 2022 | H2H |
| Camila Osorio | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 19, 2026 | H2H |