H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Johanna Konta vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 2-1
Johanna Konta holds a 2–1 lead over Kiki Bertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Johanna Konta leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Johanna Konta won the 2019 Rome semifinal 5-7 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2019* | Rome | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Johanna Konta | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2019* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Kiki Bertens | 7-6(10) 6-4 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2017* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Johanna Konta | 6-3 6-3 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 1,990 | 174 | 120 | 59.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johanna Konta | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2016 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #37 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |