H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Johanna Konta vs Mariana Duque-Mariño H2H: 1-0
Johanna Konta holds a 1–0 lead over Mariana Duque-Mariño in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Johanna Konta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johanna Konta won the 2016 Monterrey third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2016* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Johanna Konta | 6-3 6-3 | Mariana Duque-Mariño | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 1,990 | 174 | 120 | 59.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Mariana Duque-Mariño | #709 | #66 | 923 | 1,657 | 48 | 82 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johanna Konta | Mariana Duque-Mariño | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #109 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #192 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,453 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,439 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #145 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,483 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,454 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2016 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #78 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #110 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #37 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #107 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |