H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Johanna Konta vs Venus Williams H2H: 4-4

Johanna Konta and Venus Williams are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Johanna Konta leads 3–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Johanna Konta won the 2019 Rome fourth round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Johanna Konta
GBR Age 35 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2019* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Johanna Konta #42 6-2 6-4 Venus Williams #50 Match data
Mar 23, 2018* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Venus Williams #8 5-7 6-1 6-2 Johanna Konta #14 Match data
Jul 15, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Venus Williams #11 6-4 6-2 Johanna Konta #7 Match data
May 19, 2017* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Venus Williams #12 6-1 3-6 6-1 Johanna Konta #6 Match data
Apr 1, 2017* Miami WTA 1000 SF Hard Johanna Konta #11 6-4 7-5 Venus Williams #12 Match data
Jul 24, 2016* Stanford WTA 500 F Hard Johanna Konta #18 7-5 5-7 6-2 Venus Williams #7 Match data
Jan 20, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Johanna Konta #47 6-4 6-2 Venus Williams #10 Match data
Oct 3, 2015* Wuhan WTA 1000 QF Hard Venus Williams #24 6-4 3-6 7-5 Johanna Konta #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Johanna Konta #113 #4 5,110 1,990 174 120 59.2% 0 1 0 2 1 4
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Johanna Konta Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2011 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2012 2–3 40.0% #156 1,506 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2013 3–5 37.5% #114 1,505 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2014 2–8 20.0% #148 1,459 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2015 13–8 61.9% #48 1,694 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2016 42–22 65.6% #10 1,854 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2017 36–17 67.9% #9 1,836 0 3 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2018 25–23 52.1% #37 1,794 0 3 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2019 33–15 68.8% #12 1,925 0 3 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2020 8–9 47.1% #14 1,825 0 3 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2021 10–9 52.6% #113 1,807 0 4 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47