H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Johanna Larsson vs Ana Ivanovic H2H: 1-3
Ana Ivanovic holds a 3–1 lead over Johanna Larsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ana Ivanovic leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Johanna Larsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2014 Auckland fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2014* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-1 6-1 | Johanna Larsson | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2012* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-1 6-2 | Johanna Larsson | Match data |
| May 24, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Johanna Larsson | 7-6(3) 0-6 6-2 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Oct 21, 2010* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-3 6-0 | Johanna Larsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Larsson | #236 | #45 | 1,230 | 1,745 | 153 | 177 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johanna Larsson | Ana Ivanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 |
| 22 | 2011 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 |
| 23 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 |
| 25 | 2014 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #70 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 |
| 29 | 2018 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #75 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #217 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |