H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Andrea Sestini Hlavackova H2H: 3-0
Julia Goerges holds a 3–0 lead over Andrea Sestini Hlavackova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2014 Quebec City quarterfinal 6-7(6) 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2014* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-2 | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | Match data |
| May 15, 2013* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | Match data |
| Sep 16, 2010* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-3 6-2 | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | #602 | #58 | 1,055 | 1,641 | 37 | 62 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #166 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #284 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #480 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |