H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands H2H: 2-2
Julia Goerges and Bethanie Mattek-Sands are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2016 Bastad fourth round 2-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2016* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Match data |
| Sep 17, 2010* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | 6-1 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2010* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | 6-7(1) 6-4 7-5 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Feb 29, 2008* | Memphis | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-4 6-3 | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Bethanie Mattek-Sands | #1,356 | #30 | 1,643 | 1,777 | 132 | 172 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #126 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #39 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #58 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #55 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #169 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #350 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1360 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |