H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic H2H: 2-0
Julia Goerges holds a 2–0 lead over Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2013 New Haven third round 6-2 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2013* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | Match data |
| May 8, 2013* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-4 6-1 | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | #546 | #32 | 1,485 | 1,737 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #73 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #725 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,518 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |