H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 3-1
Julia Goerges holds a 3–1 lead over Coco Vandeweghe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2017 Zhuhai final 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2017* | Zhuhai | WTA Finals | F | Hard | Julia Goerges | 7-5 6-1 | Coco Vandeweghe | Match data |
| May 26, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | Coco Vandeweghe | Match data |
| May 23, 2013* | Brussels | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-1 7-5 | Coco Vandeweghe | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2010* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Coco Vandeweghe | 6-3 6-0 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Coco Vandeweghe | #815 | #9 | 3,258 | 1,877 | 138 | 151 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Coco Vandeweghe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #476 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #322 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #113 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #241 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #174 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,533 | 0 | 2 |