H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 3-1

Julia Goerges holds a 3–1 lead over Coco Vandeweghe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2017 Zhuhai final 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julia Goerges
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julia Goerges #18 7-5 6-1 Coco Vandeweghe #12 Match data Nov 5, 2017* F Zhuhai WTA Finals Hard
Julia Goerges #72 6-2 5-7 6-1 Coco Vandeweghe #33 Match data May 26, 2015* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Julia Goerges #24 6-1 7-5 Coco Vandeweghe #99 Match data May 23, 2013* R32 Brussels Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Coco Vandeweghe #172 6-3 6-0 Julia Goerges #42 Match data Sep 30, 2010* R16 Pan Pacific Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,945 311 251 55.3% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julia Goerges Coco Vandeweghe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0
18 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0
19 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0
20 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,589 0 0 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0
21 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0
22 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,773 0 2 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1
23 2012 36–26 58.1% #18 1,761 0 2 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1
24 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,543 0 2 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2
25 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,587 0 2 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2
26 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,609 0 2 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2
27 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,668 0 2 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2
28 2017 46–22 67.6% #14 1,892 0 4 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2
29 2018 45–23 66.2% #14 1,871 0 6 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2
30 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,802 0 7 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2
31 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,763 0 7 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julia Goerges Coco Vandeweghe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 2009 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2010 16 14 30 53.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
23 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
24 2013 7 16 23 30.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
25 2014 10 10 20 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
26 2015 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
27 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 35 13 48 72.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 28 14 42 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
30 2019 19 12 31 61.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 197 156 353 55.8% 86 73 159 54.1% 26 20 46 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 524/562 of Julia Goerges's and 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Julia Goerges Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4%
18 2007 6/9 2.7 3.3 54.7% 64.8% 42.0% 59.6% 55.1% 54.0% 40.7% 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0%
19 2008 11/13 5.1 5.3 59.1% 67.7% 46.8% 52.0% 47.2% 59.3% 39.2% 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7%
20 2009 19/20 5.2 2.4 60.4% 68.6% 50.1% 58.4% 43.6% 61.4% 40.4% 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2%
21 2010 49/51 4.2 3.5 61.2% 66.7% 45.8% 58.1% 48.1% 58.5% 43.3% 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9%
22 2011 59/60 4.1 2.7 58.4% 70.4% 49.1% 52.6% 48.8% 61.3% 43.2% 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3%
23 2012 56/62 3.9 2.9 57.7% 67.0% 48.1% 54.3% 47.8% 59.1% 43.6% 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0%
24 2013 40/41 4.5 4.0 55.6% 66.4% 44.5% 53.8% 46.9% 56.5% 40.0% 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9%
25 2014 31/33 6.1 4.1 59.2% 68.5% 48.8% 54.2% 44.2% 60.3% 42.5% 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3%
26 2015 30/37 4.7 2.5 60.0% 67.8% 47.7% 49.3% 50.2% 59.9% 40.7% 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2%
27 2016 36/42 5.0 3.4 56.9% 71.9% 49.2% 58.3% 41.9% 61.9% 40.6% 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4%
28 2017 64/68 5.8 3.4 57.0% 72.1% 49.1% 56.1% 50.6% 62.3% 42.7% 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7%
29 2018 65/68 7.4 3.7 57.7% 74.7% 49.3% 59.1% 42.7% 63.9% 39.5% 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4%
30 2019 46/46 6.7 4.1 55.4% 73.0% 48.9% 58.3% 42.8% 62.1% 40.8% 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7%
31 2020 12/12 6.6 3.5 56.8% 70.9% 47.8% 60.1% 48.8% 61.0% 40.5% 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8%
Career — 524/562 5.3 3.4 57.9% 70.0% 48.1% 55.9% 46.6% 60.7% 41.6% — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julia Goerges Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10
18 2007 1544 122.1 +0.76 +0.36 0.884 47.2% +9 — — 40.0% -0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28
19 2008 1558 111.9 +1.60 -1.77 0.961 49.2% +4 — — 46.7% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.66 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49
20 2009 1590 119.7 +2.92 -2.21 1.046 50.8% -1 -63 +41 50.0% +0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.5 -0.08 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31
21 2010 1761 134.3 +2.06 +0.13 1.043 51.0% -59 -53 — 54.7% +0.42 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 104.4 -1.65 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12
22 2011 1774 141.6 +5.63 -0.14 1.115 52.1% -57 +89 -162 55.6% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 4–11 (27%) 98.6 -1.13 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26
23 2012 1761 139.8 +2.73 +0.03 1.067 51.4% +21 +17 -68 55.1% +0.34 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) 100.1 -0.26 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43
24 2013 1544 119.3 +0.51 -3.35 0.920 48.5% +41 +130 — 40.4% -0.70 5–10 (33%) 2–7 (22%) 89.5 +1.42 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72
25 2014 1588 128.4 +3.16 -0.41 1.070 51.1% +14 +50 — 51.2% +0.09 4–14 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 89.3 -1.01 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00
26 2015 1610 130.1 +1.79 -0.65 1.013 50.5% -4 +23 — 47.6% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.9 -0.01 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76
27 2016 1668 133.2 +4.47 -2.01 1.064 51.3% 0 +4 — 52.2% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.7 -0.80 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01
28 2017 1893 143.8 +5.08 -0.79 1.134 52.4% +26 -228 -276 66.4% +0.92 12–7 (63%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.01 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12
29 2018 1872 146.7 +6.30 -1.90 1.092 51.6% +1 -125 -90 62.3% +0.73 16–8 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 107.5 -0.46 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17
30 2019 1802 139.1 +4.10 -1.39 1.079 51.4% +14 -176 +70 56.9% +0.57 10–6 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 95.7 +0.72 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03
31 2020 1764 128.3 +1.47 -1.09 1.038 50.8% +27 -153 — 50.0% +0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.07 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
Career — 1945 141.6 +3.70 -1.05 1.060 51.2% +1 -18 -76 54.8% +0.37 95–87 (52%) 68–83 (45%) 95.2 -0.51 — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.