H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Danka Kovinic H2H: 1-2
Danka Kovinic holds a 2–1 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Danka Kovinic leads 2–0 on clay, while Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danka Kovinic won the 2020 Rome second round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2020* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Danka Kovinic | 6-1 6-0 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2016 | Moscow | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Danka Kovinic | Match data |
| Jul 17, 2015* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Danka Kovinic | 6-4 6-7(8) 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |