H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 2-1
Julia Goerges holds a 2–1 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay, while Dominika Cibulkova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2018 New Haven third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2018* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-3 6-1 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
| May 29, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-4 5-7 6-0 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Dominika Cibulkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 |