H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 1-3
Ekaterina Makarova holds a 3–1 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ekaterina Makarova leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2018 US Open second round 7-6(10) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 7-6(10) 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2018* | New Haven | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-4 6-2 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
| Aug 6, 2017 | Washington DC | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 3-6 7-6(2) 6-0 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jan 27, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 6-3 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,940 | 248 | 222 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Ekaterina Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |