H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Eugenie Bouchard H2H: 2-1
Julia Goerges holds a 2–1 lead over Eugenie Bouchard in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Eugenie Bouchard leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2019 Auckland quarterfinal 3-6 6-3 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 32
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2019* | Auckland | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Julia Goerges | 3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | Eugenie Bouchard | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2018* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-7(3) 7-5 6-1 | Eugenie Bouchard | Match data |
| May 29, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Eugenie Bouchard | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Eugenie Bouchard | #1,002 | #5 | 4,793 | 1,926 | 156 | 144 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Eugenie Bouchard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #305 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #147 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #32 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #7 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #49 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #215 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #253 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #326 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #1002 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |