H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 0-1
Iveta Benesova holds a 1–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iveta Benesova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iveta Benesova won the 2009 Roland Garros first round 7-5 4-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Iveta Benesova | 7-5 4-1 (ret.) | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |