H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Johanna Larsson H2H: 1-3
Johanna Larsson holds a 3–1 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Johanna Larsson leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2019 Auckland third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2019* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-0 6-4 | Johanna Larsson | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2015* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Johanna Larsson | 7-5 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jan 4, 2013* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Johanna Larsson | 7-5 6-7(1) 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2008* | Stockholm | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Johanna Larsson | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Johanna Larsson | #236 | #45 | 1,230 | 1,745 | 153 | 177 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Johanna Larsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #70 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #75 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #217 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |