H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Justine Henin H2H: 0-2
Justine Henin holds a 2–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2010 Stuttgart third round 7-6(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2010* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Justine Henin | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2007* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-0 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Justine Henin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |