H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Kim Clijsters H2H: 0-1
Kim Clijsters holds a 1–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Clijsters leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2012 Miami second round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2012* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-2 7-5 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Kim Clijsters | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 |