H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Magdalena Rybarikova H2H: 2-1
Julia Goerges holds a 2–1 lead over Magdalena Rybarikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2019 Miami second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2019* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-4 7-5 | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
| Oct 31, 2017 | Zhuhai | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-1 7-6(5) | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2013* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Magdalena Rybarikova | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Magdalena Rybarikova | #199 | #17 | 2,405 | 1,817 | 188 | 207 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Magdalena Rybarikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #62 | 1,605 | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #37 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,691 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #80 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |