H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Maria Elena Camerin H2H: 2-0
Julia Goerges holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Elena Camerin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2010 Strasbourg third round 5-7 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2010* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 5-7 7-5 6-1 | Maria Elena Camerin | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2007* | Stockholm | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | Maria Elena Camerin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Maria Elena Camerin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |