H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 1-1

Julia Goerges and Marina Erakovic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay, while Marina Erakovic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2015 Madrid Open first round 6-1 0-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julia Goerges
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Marina Erakovic
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julia Goerges #68 6-1 0-6 6-4 Marina Erakovic #86 Match data May 4, 2015 R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Marina Erakovic #53 6-2 7-6(5) Julia Goerges #102 Match data Jun 26, 2008* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,945 311 251 55.3% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Marina Erakovic #827 #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julia Goerges Marina Erakovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0
18 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0
20 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,589 0 0 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0
21 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0
22 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,773 0 2 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0
23 2012 36–26 58.1% #18 1,761 0 2 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0
24 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,543 0 2 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0
25 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,587 0 2 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,669 0 1
26 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,609 0 2 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1
27 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,668 0 2 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1
28 2017 46–22 67.6% #14 1,892 0 4 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1
29 2018 45–23 66.2% #14 1,871 0 6 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1
30 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,802 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,763 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julia Goerges Marina Erakovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
21 2010 16 14 30 53.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2013 7 16 23 30.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2014 10 10 20 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2015 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
28 2017 35 13 48 72.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2018 28 14 42 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2019 19 12 31 61.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 197 156 353 55.8% 86 73 159 54.1% 26 20 46 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 524/562 of Julia Goerges's and 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Julia Goerges Marina Erakovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2007 6/9 2.7 3.3 54.7% 64.8% 42.0% 59.6% 55.1% 54.0% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 11/13 5.1 5.3 59.1% 67.7% 46.8% 52.0% 47.2% 59.3% 39.2% 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8%
20 2009 19/20 5.2 2.4 60.4% 68.6% 50.1% 58.4% 43.6% 61.4% 40.4% 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8%
21 2010 49/51 4.2 3.5 61.2% 66.7% 45.8% 58.1% 48.1% 58.5% 43.3% 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2%
22 2011 59/60 4.1 2.7 58.4% 70.4% 49.1% 52.6% 48.8% 61.3% 43.2% 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6%
23 2012 56/62 3.9 2.9 57.7% 67.0% 48.1% 54.3% 47.8% 59.1% 43.6% 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5%
24 2013 40/41 4.5 4.0 55.6% 66.4% 44.5% 53.8% 46.9% 56.5% 40.0% 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6%
25 2014 31/33 6.1 4.1 59.2% 68.5% 48.8% 54.2% 44.2% 60.3% 42.5% 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4%
26 2015 30/37 4.7 2.5 60.0% 67.8% 47.7% 49.3% 50.2% 59.9% 40.7% 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9%
27 2016 36/42 5.0 3.4 56.9% 71.9% 49.2% 58.3% 41.9% 61.9% 40.6% 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0%
28 2017 64/68 5.8 3.4 57.0% 72.1% 49.1% 56.1% 50.6% 62.3% 42.7% 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0%
29 2018 65/68 7.4 3.7 57.7% 74.7% 49.3% 59.1% 42.7% 63.9% 39.5% 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1%
30 2019 46/46 6.7 4.1 55.4% 73.0% 48.9% 58.3% 42.8% 62.1% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 12/12 6.6 3.5 56.8% 70.9% 47.8% 60.1% 48.8% 61.0% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 524/562 5.3 3.4 57.9% 70.0% 48.1% 55.9% 46.6% 60.7% 41.6% — 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julia Goerges Marina Erakovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1498 95.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.29
18 2007 1544 122.1 +0.76 +0.36 0.884 47.2% +9 — — 40.0% -0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1558 111.9 +1.60 -1.77 0.961 49.2% +4 — — 46.7% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.66 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +5 — — 21.4% -1.36 1–1 — — +0.10
20 2009 1590 119.7 +2.92 -2.21 1.046 50.8% -1 -63 +41 50.0% +0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.5 -0.08 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -43 +12 +208 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05
21 2010 1761 134.3 +2.06 +0.13 1.043 51.0% -59 -53 — 54.7% +0.42 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 104.4 -1.65 2009 1514 108.9 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -38 — — 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.07
22 2011 1774 141.6 +5.63 -0.14 1.115 52.1% -57 +89 -162 55.6% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 4–11 (27%) 98.6 -1.13 2010 1480 102.7 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -44 — +254 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.06
23 2012 1761 139.8 +2.73 +0.03 1.067 51.4% +21 +17 -68 55.1% +0.34 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) 100.1 -0.26 2011 1627 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -74 — +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +0.24
24 2013 1544 119.3 +0.51 -3.35 0.920 48.5% +41 +130 — 40.4% -0.70 5–10 (33%) 2–7 (22%) 89.5 +1.42 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -33 +124 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89
25 2014 1588 128.4 +3.16 -0.41 1.070 51.1% +14 +50 — 51.2% +0.09 4–14 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 89.3 -1.01 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -29 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26
26 2015 1610 130.1 +1.79 -0.65 1.013 50.5% -4 +23 — 47.6% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.9 -0.01 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +39 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.33
27 2016 1668 133.2 +4.47 -2.01 1.064 51.3% 0 +4 — 52.2% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.7 -0.80 2015 1542 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +77 -39 +69 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36
28 2017 1893 143.8 +5.08 -0.79 1.134 52.4% +26 -228 -276 66.4% +0.92 12–7 (63%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.01 2016 1620 110.9 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55
29 2018 1872 146.7 +6.30 -1.90 1.092 51.6% +1 -125 -90 62.3% +0.73 16–8 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 107.5 -0.46 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.44
30 2019 1802 139.1 +4.10 -1.39 1.079 51.4% +14 -176 +70 56.9% +0.57 10–6 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 95.7 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 1764 128.3 +1.47 -1.09 1.038 50.8% +27 -153 — 50.0% +0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1945 141.6 +3.70 -1.05 1.060 51.2% +1 -18 -76 54.8% +0.37 95–87 (52%) 68–83 (45%) 95.2 -0.51 — 1696 119.6 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.