H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Michelle Larcher De Brito H2H: 1-0

Julia Goerges holds a 1–0 lead over Michelle Larcher De Brito in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2014 Roland Garros round of 128 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julia Goerges
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Michelle Larcher De Brito
Portugal Age 33 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julia Goerges #107 6-2 6-3 Michelle Larcher De Brito #117 Match data May 28, 2014* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,945 311 251 55.3% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Michelle Larcher De Brito #1,216 #76 821 1,630 30 42 41.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julia Goerges Michelle Larcher De Brito
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #296 1,518 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2008 8–6 57.1% #130 1,616 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2009 5–7 41.7% #113 1,603 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2010 5–8 38.5% #210 1,571 0 0
18 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 2012 3–6 33.3% #130 1,528 0 0
20 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,589 0 0 2013 3–7 30.0% #117 1,508 0 0
21 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2014 2–5 28.6% #123 1,497 0 0
22 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,773 0 2 2015 2–1 66.7% #226 1,530 0 0
23 2012 36–26 58.1% #18 1,761 0 2 2016 1–1 50.0% #231 1,519 0 0
24 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,543 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,587 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,609 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,668 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2017 46–22 67.6% #14 1,892 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2018 45–23 66.2% #14 1,871 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,802 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,763 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julia Goerges Michelle Larcher De Brito
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
18 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2009 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
21 2010 16 14 30 53.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2016 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2013 7 16 23 30.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2014 10 10 20 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 35 13 48 72.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 28 14 42 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 19 12 31 61.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 197 156 353 55.8% 86 73 159 54.1% 26 20 46 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — 15 27 42 35.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 524/562 of Julia Goerges's and 53/72 of Michelle Larcher De Brito's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Julia Goerges Michelle Larcher De Brito
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 0.5 11.5 55.9% 56.7% 44.7% 51.3% 45.0% 51.4% 40.0%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 10/14 0.6 5.5 62.0% 57.5% 45.0% 53.1% 45.9% 52.5% 45.4%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 10/12 0.3 8.7 61.7% 56.7% 39.7% 45.7% 58.6% 50.2% 44.9%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 12/13 0.3 5.8 57.0% 55.8% 42.9% 50.3% 48.5% 50.7% 39.7%
18 2007 6/9 2.7 3.3 54.7% 64.8% 42.0% 59.6% 55.1% 54.0% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 11/13 5.1 5.3 59.1% 67.7% 46.8% 52.0% 47.2% 59.3% 39.2% 2012 7/9 0.6 5.6 64.8% 53.2% 37.0% 47.6% 55.6% 47.5% 46.0%
20 2009 19/20 5.2 2.4 60.4% 68.6% 50.1% 58.4% 43.6% 61.4% 40.4% 2013 4/10 0.0 3.8 62.7% 53.0% 47.9% 43.9% 39.6% 51.2% 37.9%
21 2010 49/51 4.2 3.5 61.2% 66.7% 45.8% 58.1% 48.1% 58.5% 43.3% 2014 3/7 0.7 6.0 56.3% 58.2% 45.8% 59.1% 21.9% 52.9% 41.1%
22 2011 59/60 4.1 2.7 58.4% 70.4% 49.1% 52.6% 48.8% 61.3% 43.2% 2015 3/3 1.0 4.3 73.5% 56.7% 69.8% 49.6% 74.1% 60.0% 44.6%
23 2012 56/62 3.9 2.9 57.7% 67.0% 48.1% 54.3% 47.8% 59.1% 43.6% 2016 2/2 1.0 3.5 69.9% 59.3% 41.7% 55.0% 30.0% 54.2% 38.0%
24 2013 40/41 4.5 4.0 55.6% 66.4% 44.5% 53.8% 46.9% 56.5% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2014 31/33 6.1 4.1 59.2% 68.5% 48.8% 54.2% 44.2% 60.3% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 30/37 4.7 2.5 60.0% 67.8% 47.7% 49.3% 50.2% 59.9% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 36/42 5.0 3.4 56.9% 71.9% 49.2% 58.3% 41.9% 61.9% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 64/68 5.8 3.4 57.0% 72.1% 49.1% 56.1% 50.6% 62.3% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 65/68 7.4 3.7 57.7% 74.7% 49.3% 59.1% 42.7% 63.9% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 46/46 6.7 4.1 55.4% 73.0% 48.9% 58.3% 42.8% 62.1% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 12/12 6.6 3.5 56.8% 70.9% 47.8% 60.1% 48.8% 61.0% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 524/562 5.3 3.4 57.9% 70.0% 48.1% 55.9% 46.6% 60.7% 41.6% — 53/72 0.5 6.2 61.6% 56.1% 44.0% 49.8% 49.3% 51.4% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julia Goerges Michelle Larcher De Brito
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1519 107.6 -2.05 +2.65 0.822 45.7% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.27
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1616 127.4 -1.08 +1.24 0.955 49.0% +27 — — 50.0% -0.21 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 105.0 -0.01
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1603 111.7 -2.92 -0.21 0.902 47.8% +1 -47 — 42.9% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 97.3 +0.35
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1571 104.1 -2.73 -2.95 0.806 45.7% -18 0 +67 33.3% -0.97 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.26
18 2007 1544 122.1 +0.76 +0.36 0.884 47.2% +9 — — 40.0% -0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1558 111.9 +1.60 -1.77 0.961 49.2% +4 — — 46.7% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.66 2012 1529 101.7 -3.16 -0.55 0.875 46.7% -20 — — 37.5% -0.67 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — +0.81
20 2009 1590 119.7 +2.92 -2.21 1.046 50.8% -1 -63 +41 50.0% +0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.5 -0.08 2013 1509 106.8 -1.46 -0.63 0.776 44.9% -53 — +145 28.6% -1.43 1–0 1–1 — +0.34
21 2010 1761 134.3 +2.06 +0.13 1.043 51.0% -59 -53 — 54.7% +0.42 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 104.4 -1.65 2014 1498 101.1 -0.50 +1.15 0.872 46.8% — — +212 33.3% -1.11 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.35
22 2011 1774 141.6 +5.63 -0.14 1.115 52.1% -57 +89 -162 55.6% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 4–11 (27%) 98.6 -1.13 2015 1530 108.6 +0.29 -0.81 1.116 52.2% — — +205 57.1% +0.43 1–0 1–0 — +0.22
23 2012 1761 139.8 +2.73 +0.03 1.067 51.4% +21 +17 -68 55.1% +0.34 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) 100.1 -0.26 2016 1520 93.1 -1.26 -1.07 0.829 46.8% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.02
24 2013 1544 119.3 +0.51 -3.35 0.920 48.5% +41 +130 — 40.4% -0.70 5–10 (33%) 2–7 (22%) 89.5 +1.42 2017 1502 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2014 1588 128.4 +3.16 -0.41 1.070 51.1% +14 +50 — 51.2% +0.09 4–14 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 89.3 -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 1610 130.1 +1.79 -0.65 1.013 50.5% -4 +23 — 47.6% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.9 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 1668 133.2 +4.47 -2.01 1.064 51.3% 0 +4 — 52.2% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.7 -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 1893 143.8 +5.08 -0.79 1.134 52.4% +26 -228 -276 66.4% +0.92 12–7 (63%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 1872 146.7 +6.30 -1.90 1.092 51.6% +1 -125 -90 62.3% +0.73 16–8 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 107.5 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 1802 139.1 +4.10 -1.39 1.079 51.4% +14 -176 +70 56.9% +0.57 10–6 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 95.7 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 1764 128.3 +1.47 -1.09 1.038 50.8% +27 -153 — 50.0% +0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1945 141.6 +3.70 -1.05 1.060 51.2% +1 -18 -76 54.8% +0.37 95–87 (52%) 68–83 (45%) 95.2 -0.51 — 1630 112.2 -2.04 -0.51 0.879 47.3% -6 -24 +150 39.8% -0.73 19–10 (66%) 7–9 (44%) 106.7 +2.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.