H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Monica Niculescu H2H: 1-1
Julia Goerges and Monica Niculescu are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Niculescu won the 2012 Luxembourg fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2012* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Monica Niculescu | 6-4 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Sep 26, 2012* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-3 6-2 | Monica Niculescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Monica Niculescu | #958 | #28 | 1,960 | 1,807 | 176 | 213 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Monica Niculescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #48 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #103 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #58 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #77 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #118 | 1,627 | 0 | 3 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 |