H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Olga Govortsova H2H: 2-2
Julia Goerges and Olga Govortsova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–0 on clay, while Olga Govortsova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Olga Govortsova won the 2013 Stanford third round 7-6(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 37
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2013* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Olga Govortsova | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Apr 4, 2013* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-2 0-6 6-3 | Olga Govortsova | Match data |
| Apr 6, 2011* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 7-5 6-4 | Olga Govortsova | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2008* | Memphis | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Olga Govortsova | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Olga Govortsova | #1,276 | #35 | 1,510 | 1,705 | 123 | 186 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Olga Govortsova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #48 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #75 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #111 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #57 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #149 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #170 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #393 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |