H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 1-4
Petra Kvitova holds a 4–1 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2018 Birmingham quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 36
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2018* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Petra Kvitova | 6-1 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2018* | Doha | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Petra Kvitova | 6-4 2-1 (ret.) | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2018* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Petra Kvitova | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2013* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Petra Kvitova | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2010* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 6-1 | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Petra Kvitova | #450 | #2 | 7,690 | 2,073 | 501 | 258 | 66.0% | 2 | 10 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 31 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Petra Kvitova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #50 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #34 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 50–11 | 82.0% | #2 | 2,058 | 1 | 7 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #8 | 1,961 | 1 | 9 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #6 | 1,966 | 1 | 11 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 2 | 14 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #6 | 1,907 | 2 | 17 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,966 | 2 | 19 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #29 | 1,894 | 2 | 20 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 2 | 25 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #7 | 1,897 | 2 | 27 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 20–7 | 74.1% | #8 | 1,947 | 2 | 27 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #17 | 1,881 | 2 | 28 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #16 | 1,920 | 2 | 29 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #14 | 1,931 | 2 | 31 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,773 | 2 | 31 |