H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Risa Ozaki H2H: 1-1
Julia Goerges and Risa Ozaki are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay, while Risa Ozaki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Risa Ozaki won the 2017 Miami third round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 32
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Risa Ozaki | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2015* | Bad Gastein | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-3 6-4 | Risa Ozaki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Risa Ozaki | #1,109 | #70 | 826 | 1,638 | 17 | 38 | 30.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Risa Ozaki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #155 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #118 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #289 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |