H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 1-3
Roberta Vinci holds a 3–1 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2018 St. Petersburg fourth round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 43
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2018* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 7-5 6-0 | Roberta Vinci | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2016* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Roberta Vinci | 6-3 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2013 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Roberta Vinci | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2010* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Roberta Vinci | 6-3 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Roberta Vinci | #193 | #7 | 3,615 | 1,923 | 320 | 287 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Roberta Vinci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #184 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,774 | 0 | 6 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #16 | 1,834 | 0 | 7 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,853 | 0 | 9 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,712 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #15 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,733 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,628 | 0 | 10 |