H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Samantha Stosur H2H: 5-1

Julia Goerges holds a 5–1 lead over Samantha Stosur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 4–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2017 Indian Wells second round 4-6 6-4 6-4.

GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 11, 2017* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Julia Goerges #50 4-6 6-4 6-4 Samantha Stosur #18 Match data
Mar 23, 2016* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Julia Goerges #66 3-6 6-1 6-4 Samantha Stosur #27 Match data
Oct 4, 2012* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Julia Goerges #21 7-6(2) 4-6 7-5 Samantha Stosur #9 Match data
Apr 27, 2012* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Samantha Stosur #5 6-2 2-6 6-3 Julia Goerges #21 Match data
Apr 23, 2011* Stuttgart WTA 500 SF Clay Julia Goerges #32 6-4 3-6 7-5 Samantha Stosur #7 Match data
Sep 30, 2010* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Julia Goerges #42 7-5 6-3 Samantha Stosur #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,940 304 249 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Julia Goerges Samantha Stosur
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0
2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0
2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,588 0 0 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0
2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0
2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,772 0 2 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0
2012 34–25 57.6% #18 1,751 0 2 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0
2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,535 0 2 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0
2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,596 0 2 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1
2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,612 0 2 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2
2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,671 0 2 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3
2017 42–22 65.6% #14 1,880 0 4 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3
2018 44–22 66.7% #14 1,861 0 6 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5
2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,799 0 7 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6
2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,761 0 7 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8
2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8
2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9
2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9
2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9
2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9
2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9
2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9