H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Julia Goerges vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-5

Serena Williams holds a 5–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2019 Wimbledon third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julia Goerges
GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 7, 2019* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Serena Williams #10 6-3 6-4 Julia Goerges #17 Match data
Jul 14, 2018* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Serena Williams #181 6-2 6-4 Julia Goerges #13 Match data
Jun 2, 2018* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Serena Williams #451 6-3 6-4 Julia Goerges #11 Match data
Aug 8, 2011 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Serena Williams #80 6-1 7-6(7) Julia Goerges #20 Match data
May 26, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-1 6-1 Julia Goerges #77 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,940 304 249 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Julia Goerges Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,588 0 0 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,772 0 2 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
2012 34–25 57.6% #18 1,751 0 2 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,535 0 2 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,596 0 2 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,612 0 2 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,671 0 2 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
2017 42–22 65.6% #14 1,880 0 4 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
2018 44–22 66.7% #14 1,861 0 6 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,799 0 7 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,761 0 7 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
— — — — — — — 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
— — — — — — — 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
— — — — — — — 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
— — — — — — — 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
— — — — — — — 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
— — — — — — — 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
— — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
— — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
— — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
— — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
— — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
— — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
— — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71