H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Shahar Peer H2H: 4-0
Julia Goerges holds a 4–0 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2012 Cincinnati second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2012* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-3 6-3 | Shahar Peer | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2012* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Julia Goerges | 6-2 6-2 | Shahar Peer | Match data |
| Feb 9, 2012* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Julia Goerges | 6-1 6-3 | Shahar Peer | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2011* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-2 6-3 | Shahar Peer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,966 | 268 | 204 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Shahar Peer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #74 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,526 | 0 | 5 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |