H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Sofia Arvidsson H2H: 3-0
Julia Goerges holds a 3–0 lead over Sofia Arvidsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2013 Indian Wells second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2013* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-3 6-3 | Sofia Arvidsson | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2012* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-1 6-4 | Sofia Arvidsson | Match data |
| Sep 17, 2009* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-3 7-5 | Sofia Arvidsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Sofia Arvidsson | #320 | #29 | 1,380 | 1,775 | 113 | 154 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Sofia Arvidsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #67 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #98 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #41 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #120 | 1,597 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |