H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Stefanie Voegele H2H: 1-2
Stefanie Voegele holds a 2–1 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Stefanie Voegele leads 2–0 on clay, while Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefanie Voegele won the 2014 Bad Gastein third round 7-6(0) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2014* | Bad Gastein | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Stefanie Voegele | 7-6(0) 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Apr 5, 2013* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Stefanie Voegele | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2010* | Copenhagen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 6-4 | Stefanie Voegele | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,712 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Stefanie Voegele | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |