H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Julie Harrington vs Dana Gilbert H2H: 0-2

Dana Gilbert holds a 2–0 lead over Julie Harrington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dana Gilbert leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Dana Gilbert won the 1983 Roland Garros round of 128 6-4 3-6 6-4.

H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dana Gilbert 6-4 3-6 6-4 Julie Harrington Match data May 25, 1983* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Dana Gilbert 7-6 2-6 6-3 Julie Harrington Match data Oct 17, 1980* R16 Nagoya WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julie Harrington — #70 — 1,742 56 81 40.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dana Gilbert — — — 1,712 61 79 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julie Harrington Dana Gilbert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,524 0 0 1977 1–1 50.0% — 1,509 0 0
18 1980 13–18 41.9% — 1,605 0 0 1978 8–5 61.5% — 1,613 0 1
19 1981 18–15 54.5% — 1,725 0 0 1979 3–13 18.8% — 1,554 0 1
20 1982 6–19 24.0% — 1,590 0 0 1980 14–12 53.8% — 1,664 0 2
21 1983 15–16 48.4% — 1,629 0 0 1981 6–12 33.3% — 1,612 0 2
22 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0 1982 20–15 57.1% — 1,664 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 1983 9–21 30.0% — 1,540 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julie Harrington Dana Gilbert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1979 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 6 0 6 100.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 7 8 12.5% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 13 9 22 59.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 5 9 14 35.7% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 12 23 35 34.3% — 25 33 58 43.1% 35 33 68 51.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julie Harrington Dana Gilbert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1979 1524 114.7 — — — — +97 — — 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.67 1977 1509 98.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.42
18 1980 1606 124.5 — — — — -18 -23 -131 43.3% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.8 -0.77 1978 1614 120.1 — — — — -32 +64 — 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 +0.46
19 1981 1726 127.8 — — — — +23 -106 — 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.6 +3.25 1979 1555 110.1 — — — — -25 +142 — 22.2% -2.20 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.72
20 1982 1590 116.7 — — — — -34 +6 — 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.72 1980 1664 123.8 — — — — -110 +96 — 54.8% +0.37 4–8 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 100.9 +0.95
21 1983 1630 115.7 — — — — +32 -33 — 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.38 1981 1613 104.6 — — — — -27 +80 — 34.9% -1.44 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +0.32
22 1984 1572 106.0 — — — — +13 — — 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.38 1982 1664 118.3 — — — — -83 +48 — 56.6% +0.49 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 98.6 +2.24
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1540 101.0 — — — — +29 +72 — 34.3% -1.46 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) — +1.43
Career — 1743 124.2 — — — — +16 -29 -131 42.1% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +3.23 — 1712 116.0 — — — — -43 +72 — 44.8% -0.54 23–27 (46%) 15–9 (63%) 104.4 +4.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.