H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kaia Kanepi vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 2-3

Daniela Hantuchova holds a 3–2 lead over Kaia Kanepi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Kaia Kanepi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kaia Kanepi won the 2013 Madrid fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kaia Kanepi
EST Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 2013* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Kaia Kanepi #51 6-3 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #71 Match data
Jan 8, 2012* Brisbane WTA 500 F Hard Kaia Kanepi #34 6-2 6-1 Daniela Hantuchova #24 Match data
Aug 26, 2010* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #26 7-5 6-3 Kaia Kanepi #33 Match data
Mar 5, 2010* Monterrey WTA 500 R16 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #24 6-1 6-3 Kaia Kanepi #95 Match data
Mar 7, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #18 6-2 2-6 6-1 Kaia Kanepi #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,912 261 235 52.6% 0 0 0 2 2 4
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kaia Kanepi Daniela Hantuchova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1
20 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,538 0 0 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1
21 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,610 0 0 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1
22 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,583 0 0 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1
23 2008 28–20 58.3% #27 1,747 0 0 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1
24 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,598 0 0 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3
25 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,839 0 1 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3
26 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,816 0 1 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3
27 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,868 0 3 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3
28 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,841 0 4 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4
29 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,718 0 4 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5
30 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,649 0 4 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6
31 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,655 0 4 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6
32 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,725 0 4 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7
33 2018 11–11 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7
34 2019 9–10 47.4% #101 1,748 0 4 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7
35 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,719 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,703 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,801 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2023 6–16 27.3% #168 1,607 0 4 — — — — — — —